Fashion Blogs

It's hard to find a more personal statement or method of collaborative support than using our bodies as a canvas to permanently mark your own skin. Tattoo artists are perhaps among the most prolific art producers. Her clients' tattooed compositions are broader and more visible than works executed in almost any other medium. In the field of tattooing, however, there is seldom a sufficiently detailed or serious analysis of the activity and of the technological and socio-economic implications associated with it. See https://whatisfullformof.com/tips-on-getting-tattoo-ideas-you-wont-regret/

Let's take a quick look at the article from New Zealand. As is often the case with online tattoo writing, the content often serves primarily as a means of promoting images that promote inking as a practice, and is then peppered with quotes from a handful of [often mainstream] artists with whom easy to get in touch with. However, it is worth examining more closely the implications of copyrighted tattoo designs and related forms of body art, particularly finished tattoo works:

"Tattoo Artists Claim Copyright for Their Work | There is an unwritten rule in New Zealand - decent tattoo artists don't copy designs. The 1994 Copyright Act is currently under review, and the artists behind the ink say tougher laws could protect the original tattoo House of Natives founder Gordon Toi would be an advocate for protecting tattoos: "I'd like some sort of control over that Seeing Maori tattooing and seeing Polynesian tattooing… there's so much exploitation.” The original designs were copied many times, often even abroad and without speaking to the New Zealand artist, he said.

"Skin is probably the hardest thing to copyright because everyone copies it." Pacific Tattoo owner Tim Hunt wanted artists to respect the importance of Maori and Pacific cultural patterns and symbols. "Any artist could say I can make you a design that has a chorus and looks Maori," Hunt said.

"But if you want something authentic, you have to go somewhere else." Tattoo artists are sued abroad when their designs appear in media such as television. In 2011, the artist behind Mike Tyson's Maori-inspired face tattoo sued Warner Bros. for showing a similar face drawing on a character in The Hangover: Part II. If copyright protected cultural images, Hunt would respect the change. "I want more tattoo artists to stand up and say, 'I don't know enough about this, I don't know the story behind it, and I don't know the context behind it.'" Overseas, tattoo artists replicate images without thinking.

New Zealand is different, he said. "It's kind of an unspoken code in New Zealand that you just don't do that." Hunt believed the tattoo belonged to the client, not the artist. Union Tattoo owner Craigy Lee agreed that there is an unwritten code of conduct not to copy a custom tattoo. Decent artists wouldn't dare make money from someone else's design, he said. Alex Sims, Associate Professor at the University of Auckland, said technically what is happening in New Zealand now is likely copyright infringement - under the banner of artworks. However, Sims cautioned against strict enforcement of tattoo copyright laws, which could include removing tattoos, preventing tattoos from appearing in films and advertisements, or removing tattoos from social media. "This would give the copyright holder the power to control the images. person, which would be extremely worrying and just plain wrong."